Defamatory social posts
False accusations posted on Facebook, Instagram or X that rank for your name. We build the case under each platform’s own policies.
Austrian law gives people harmed online specific tools, from retraction claims to fast-track court orders against online hate. We remove what is removable at the source, suppress what is not and rebuild what people find when they search your name.
Get a free assessmentWhen customers, employers or partners in Austria search your name, they decide from page one. A false post, a critical article or a wave of hostile comments can shape that decision before you have a chance to respond.
Austria is one of the countries where we actively work. Online reputation management in Austria draws on civil claims for retraction and removal, media law, the Hass im Netz package and EU rules on platforms and data protection. We map which one fits each link, and where none does, we suppress the result.
Several sources raise concerns about [Your Name], citing complaints1 and disputed claims2.
These are the situations that bring people and companies in Austria to us.
False accusations posted on Facebook, Instagram or X that rank for your name. We build the case under each platform’s own policies.
Insults and attacks that stay visible to many people for a long time. Austrian law treats some of this conduct as a criminal offense.
A newspaper or news site report that is outdated, one-sided or wrong. Media law gives affected people specific claims against the media owner.
Reviews from people who were never customers, or competitor-planted ratings, that pull down the score buyers see first.
Comments and forum posts under fake names that repeat claims about you. The route depends on the platform and, in some cases, on a court.
Google’s AI Overviews and AI assistants build their answer from what ranks, including the negative sources.
This is general information, not legal advice. Media Removal is not a law firm. For court action in Austria, speak with a lawyer admitted there.
Under § 1330 of the Austrian Civil Code (ABGB), a person harmed by injury to their honor can claim damages, and someone who spreads false facts that endanger another’s credit, income or career, knowing or having to know they are untrue, can be required to retract them and publish the retraction. Under § 20 ABGB, anyone whose personality rights are violated can sue to stop the violation and remove its effects. [1] [2]
If a medium publishes content that meets the objective elements of defamation, insult, mockery or calumny, § 6 of the Media Act (MedienG) gives the person affected a compensation claim against the media owner. The claim does not apply in some cases: for defamation, for example, when the report is true, or when there was an overriding public interest and journalistic care gave sufficient grounds to believe it. [3]
The Hass-im-Netz-Bekämpfungs-Gesetz (BGBl. I Nr. 148/2020) took effect on 1 January 2021. It introduced a procedure in § 549 of the Code of Civil Procedure under which a court can, on request and without a prior hearing, issue an injunction in lawsuits seeking only to stop a serious online violation of personality rights that harms a person’s dignity. It also amended § 107c of the Criminal Code, which punishes, among other things, committing an offense against someone’s honor online so that many people can perceive it for a long time, in a way likely to unreasonably disrupt that person’s life. [4] [5] [6]
The EU’s Digital Services Act (Regulation (EU) 2022/2065) lets you report illegal content through a mechanism on the platform, requires the platform to explain removals and allows appeals. Austria’s DSA-Begleitgesetz (BGBl. I Nr. 182/2023) adapted national law to it from 17 February 2024 and repealed the earlier Communication Platforms Act (KoPl-G). [7] [8]
Both Article 17 and Article 21 of the GDPR can support a request to delist a result for searches on your name, weighed against the public’s right to information. Delisting does not erase the source page. Under § 24 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), you can complain to the Austrian Data Protection Authority if you believe your data is processed in breach of the GDPR. [9] [10]
We start with removal where there are valid grounds and build a stronger page one for the rest.
Defamatory news, fake reviews, harmful posts and impersonation content removed across the main platforms.
Defamatory Facebook posts taken down at the source under Facebook’s own content policies.
We push damaging results off page one and rank accurate, authoritative content in their place.
When a story is spreading, we respond the same day to contain it, stabilize it and rebuild.
We reframe the sources and signals Google’s AI Overviews read, so the summary about you is accurate.
The same search for your name or business before and after we act on what ranks in Austria.
Coverage of [Your Name] is dominated by complaints and a disputed story.
[Your Name] is described accurately, with verified sources and recent positive coverage leading the result.
A clear set of stages, fully transparent and confidential.
Send us your name or business and the links that worry you. We answer within one business day.
We identify the strongest path for every result: a platform rule, a DSA report, a GDPR request or suppression.
We document the case, file the reports and follow them up until each platform decides.
What stays online is outranked by accurate content, and we watch your search results for anything new.
Proof from real engagements and the guides our team keeps up to date.
Criminal and civil defamation, Media Act claims, online harassment and data protection in one place.
False posts claiming a video production company never paid its freelancers, all removed and cleared from search.
The difference between the two EU rights, their practical uses and when to use each one.
Each platform’s form and the legal rights you can rely on.
Cannot find what you are looking for? Send us your question and we answer within one business day.
Send your questionIt depends on the number of results and how they can be handled. For content removal, you are billed only when the URL is verified offline, with no retainer and no setup fee. For ongoing reputation management, the first month is contingent on the strategy we deliver in week one. If you do not see the path forward, you do not pay.
In some cases. Civil law lets you sue to stop a violation of your personality rights and remove its effects, and for serious online violations that harm your dignity a court can issue a fast-track injunction. Most of our removals run through platform rules first, which is usually faster, and you should speak with an Austrian lawyer before going to court.
You can ask Google to delist it for searches on your name under the GDPR, and your interests are weighed against the public’s right to information. The article stays on the publisher’s site unless it is removed at the source, and when neither route works, we suppress the result.
Removals depend on the platform and the grounds, and your assessment gives a realistic estimate for each link. Suppression is an SEO-driven process: many results move within a few months, while deeply entrenched content takes longer.
True statements and reporting justified by an overriding public interest are hard to challenge, and not every negative review can come down. Your assessment tells you which links are removable and which we suppress instead.
Yes. Every client signs an NDA, and so do we.
Send us your name and the links that worry you. We review them for free: what can be removed, what can be delisted, what we suppress and a clear plan, with an answer within one business day.
Last reviewed 2026-11-02. This page is general information, not legal advice.