Companies and brands
An account, page or website presents itself as your business or claims an affiliation your team has not authorized.
A fake company page or executive profile can make an unauthorized message look like yours. We assess the accounts and websites using your identity, document the deception, and pursue removal through the relevant platform or provider. You pay only after the agreed content is verified offline.
Get a quoteWe work with businesses and the teams responsible for their public identity.
An account, page or website presents itself as your business or claims an affiliation your team has not authorized.
A duplicate profile borrows a leader’s name, role or photograph to approach clients, staff or investors.
Your team needs a clear record of the impersonation, the grounds for reporting it, and the outcome of each request.
Representatives managing a principal’s professional identity need to address accounts that falsely claim to speak for them.
A copied profile can resemble an executive’s real account while directing people to a different contact address. A website can reuse company material and present itself as an authorized branch, partner or support team. The concern is what those pages lead people to believe about who is speaking.
The evidence needs to show that false identity or affiliation. We compare the reported page with your official presence, record how it represents itself, and choose the relevant reporting ground. A critical post, a similar name or a clearly identified fan account needs a different assessment.
Send the specific links and explain who the account or website claims to represent.
Profiles that copy a founder’s name, position or image and present themselves as that person when contacting others.
Pages using your business identity to imply that customers are dealing with your company or an authorized support team.
Sites that copy company material or describe themselves as an official office, distributor or partner without authorization. We assess the available provider and rights-reporting routes.
Channels or posts that make a company or executive appear to own, authorize or endorse content they did not approve.
Company photos, videos or original artwork reused as part of the impersonation. We check ownership before considering a copyright notice.
Different policies protect identity, affiliation and copyrighted work. These examples explain the distinction; they are general information, not legal advice.
LinkedIn identifies impersonation and profiles that do not represent real people as reasons to report a profile. Its guidance includes duplicate identities and unsupported claims to be a company executive. An incomplete profile alone is not proof that it is fake. [1]
X prohibits impersonating individuals, groups or organizations to deceive others. It allows parody, commentary and fan accounts that meet its requirements for making their purpose and lack of affiliation clear. [2]
YouTube prohibits unauthorized impersonation of a person, entity or channel that may mislead viewers in a way that could harm its community. Its examples include deceptive copying of branding or usernames. A channel found to have been established for impersonation may be removed. [3]
Under 16 CFR 461.3, materially and falsely posing as a business or its officer, or materially misrepresenting an affiliation with one, in or affecting commerce is an unfair or deceptive practice. A platform report still needs evidence and the appropriate reporting ground. [4]
The US notice-and-takedown system lets rights holders notify a provider about infringing material. A notice requires identification of the work and material, contact details, a signature and the required statements. We establish ownership or authorization before using this route. [5]
For a case limited to one network, these services cover its particular content and reporting channels.
For fake Instagram profiles and the posts attached to them.
We agree the scope before filing and keep the status of each request clear.
Send the reported links and your official website or profiles. We confirm who is being impersonated and who may act for them.
We record the relevant names, images, affiliation claims and linked pages, alongside the business records that support the report.
We prepare policy reports and assess rights-based or provider complaints where the facts support them. Some routes require the person or rights holder to verify their identity directly.
We follow available review channels, report the decision, and check whether the agreed content is offline. Further copies need their own assessment.
These resources explain the legal and reputation questions that can accompany an impersonation case.
For a broader review of what clients and investors find about a leader.
Cannot find what you are looking for? Send us your question and we answer within one business day.
Send your questionWe assess the account, your authority to act and the evidence of impersonation. If the facts support a reporting route, we prepare and pursue it. The platform decides whether to remove content, require changes or take another action.
We assess how the site represents itself, what material it copies and which provider or rights-reporting channels apply. A similar domain name alone does not establish a right to removal. The available route depends on the evidence and the provider involved.
Criticism alone is not impersonation. Some platforms allow clearly identified parody, commentary or fan accounts. We examine whether the account deceives people about identity or affiliation and whether another specific policy is relevant.
Start with the account or website URLs, the official identity being copied and examples of the misleading claims. We may need company records, authorization to act or proof of ownership. Use the agreed secure channel for sensitive documents; do not send account passwords.
Timing depends on the platform or provider, the evidence requested and any review process. We explain the available route after assessing the links and keep you informed of decisions. There is no fixed removal deadline across platforms.
We agree which accounts or content are in scope before starting. Content removal is billed only after the agreed content is verified offline. A platform may reject a request, and we explain that outcome rather than treating a submitted report as a removal.
Send the links and tell us which company or executive is being impersonated. We will assess the available removal routes and what your team needs to provide.
Last reviewed 2026-11-05. This page is general information, not legal advice.