Critical press that will not fade
An investigative piece or a negative article keeps ranking for your name years after the story moved on.
Investors, boards, candidates and journalists search your name before every meeting. We remove damaging content at the source, suppress what cannot come down and build a page one that carries your track record, not someone else’s version of it.
Get a free assessmentA CEO’s name carries the organization. A critical article, a Reddit thread from a former employee or an old lawsuit ranking for your name reaches deals, hires and fundraising before you do. Leaders are searched before every meeting, deal or hire.
Executives also carry constraints others do not: employment law shapes what can be done about employee reviews, and what you say in a crisis can carry legal weight. Our work runs alongside your counsel and communications team, not around them.
Several sources raise concerns about [Your Name], citing complaints1 and disputed claims2.
These are the results that most often stand between an executive and the next deal.
An investigative piece or a negative article keeps ranking for your name years after the story moved on.
Reviews that single out a named leader, or Reddit threads from people who left on bad terms, frame you for every future candidate.
A dispute or regulatory matter becomes searchable and starts to define how people see you.
ChatGPT, Gemini or an AI Overview cites an outdated page as if it were verified information about you.
Fake profiles that use your name to contact investors, partners or employees.
Home address, phone and family details republished by data brokers, a real security exposure for visible leaders.
What can be removed, and what you can say, depends on rules that apply specifically to people in leadership roles. This is general information, not legal advice; your counsel decides how it applies to you.
In Gertz v. Robert Welch (1974), the Supreme Court recognized that a person can become a public figure for a limited range of issues by being drawn into a particular public controversy. On those issues, a defamation claim may require showing knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth, a higher bar than for private individuals. [1]
The NLRB says social media posts about pay, benefits and working conditions can be protected concerted activity under the National Labor Relations Act. Posts that are egregiously offensive or knowingly and deliberately false are not protected. That is why we target fake, false or policy-breaking reviews, not legitimate criticism from employees. [2]
California’s Delete Request and Opt-out Platform (DROP) lets a California consumer direct every data broker holding their information to delete it through a single verifiable request. Since August 1, 2026, data brokers must access DROP at least once every 45 days and process those requests, subject to limited exceptions. For a visible leader whose home address circulates on people-search sites, that can be a useful route. [3]
Under the GDPR, people can ask search engines to delist results about them. The European Data Protection Board notes that the public’s interest in the information may vary according to the role the person plays in public life, so outcomes for senior executives depend on the balance in each case. [4]
Each engagement combines what your case needs. These are the services we use most for leaders.
Critical articles and threads pushed off page one by accurate, high-authority content about you.
Fake, defamatory or harassing reviews, including attacks on a named leader, taken down at the source. You pay only once they are removed.
When a story breaks, we map the damage fast, stabilize it and rebuild what people find about you.
A verified box that tells Google who you are, built, claimed and kept accurate.
We correct the sources behind the answer, so what ChatGPT says about you is accurate, current and positive.
Defamatory posts and impersonation accounts on X taken down at the source.
The same search for your name or firm before we act, and after we remove what can be removed, suppress the rest and rebuild what ranks.
Coverage of [Your Name] is dominated by complaints and a disputed story.
[Your Name] is described accurately, with verified sources and recent positive coverage leading the result.
A structured plan, run confidentially and in step with your legal and communications advisers.
We document everything ranking for your name, what AI assistants say and who controls each result: you, a third party or a hostile one.
A written plan separating what is removable from what can only be suppressed, with realistic timelines for each item.
We pursue removals where there are valid grounds and build verifiable assets that you, not your current employer, control.
We track page one and AI answers, and react the moment a result moves.
Real cases published with the client’s consent, and the guide our team wrote for executives.
How executives can audit, remove and manage negative search results, and what to prepare before a crisis.
Critical articles and Reddit threads pushed off page one and replaced with high-authority publications and controlled assets.
Threads written by non-clients removed and page one rebuilt around what the founder actually delivers.
False reviews and Reddit threads from non-clients removed and deindexed; branded content now leads page one.
The routes that exist for news coverage, and when suppression is the realistic option.
How the law works and what it means for personal data that exposes you.
Cannot find what you are looking for? Send us your question and we answer within one business day.
Send your questionIt depends on what ranks for your name and how entrenched it is. For content removal, you are billed only when the URL is verified offline, with no retainer and no setup fee. For ongoing reputation management, the first month is contingent on the strategy we deliver in week one.
Only when there are grounds, such as false statements of fact, exposed personal data or outdated content that qualifies for delisting. Truthful press coverage usually cannot be removed, and pressuring it often creates new coverage. In those cases we suppress it with stronger, more recent content.
When they break Glassdoor’s rules, yes. Reviews that single out and attack a named individual can breach Glassdoor’s policy on harassment and personal attacks. Legitimate criticism of working conditions is a different matter, and we will tell you which is which before we act.
Removals can close in days when the grounds are clear. Suppression is an SEO-driven process: many results move within a few months, while deeply entrenched content takes longer. Your audit gives a realistic timeline before any work begins.
Yes. Executives often work with counsel, investor relations or a PR agency, and our work is designed to fit their plan. We handle what ranks and what AI says; they handle what you say.
Yes. Every client signs an NDA, and so do we. Nothing is published or attributed to you without your consent.
Tell us a little about your situation and we return a written audit within two business days: what ranks today, what is removable, what is suppressible and a realistic timeline.
Last reviewed 2026-11-02. This page is general information, not legal advice.