Fake and non-patient reviews
One-star reviews on Google, Healthgrades, Zocdoc or Trustpilot from people who were never patients, or from competitors, pulling down the rating.
Patients search the doctor before they book. We remove fake reviews and defamatory threads at the source, suppress what cannot come down and rebuild page one, without ever discussing a patient in public.
Get a free assessmentA patient choosing a surgeon, a dentist or a clinic is making a decision about their own health. They read the star rating, the worst review and whatever thread ranks next to your name, and many never get as far as your website. One fabricated review or a coordinated attack can undo years of careful work in a single search.
Healthcare providers also have fewer ways to defend themselves. Privacy rules mean you cannot answer a review by explaining what really happened in the treatment room. Healthcare reputation management fills that gap: it takes down what breaks platform rules or the law, pushes down what cannot be removed and builds credible content that speaks for your practice.
Several sources raise concerns about [Your Name], citing complaints1 and disputed claims2.
Medical reputations are attacked in a few recurring ways. These are the ones we see most.
One-star reviews on Google, Healthgrades, Zocdoc or Trustpilot from people who were never patients, or from competitors, pulling down the rating.
Reddit threads, and sometimes a whole subreddit, created to label a practitioner a “scam” and ranking for their name. See how we neutralized one for a surgeon.
Pages written as a former patient’s honest complaint that end by steering readers to a competing product or clinic.
Old Google Business Profile listings and directory pages with the wrong address, hours or practice, still collecting reviews in your name.
Coverage of a complaint, a lawsuit or an allegation that ranks above your credentials, sometimes long after the matter was resolved.
Google AI Overviews and AI assistants summarizing a clinician from forum posts and outdated pages instead of verified sources.
In the United States, how you respond to criticism is limited by health privacy law, and how reviews are handled is limited by consumer protection rules. Our work is built around both. This is general information, not legal advice.
Under the HIPAA Privacy Rule, a covered entity may not use or disclose protected health information except as the rule permits or requires. That is why detail about a patient’s care in a public reply can expose a practice, as the next point shows. [2]
In 2023 the HHS Office for Civil Rights announced a settlement with Manasa Health Center, a New Jersey psychiatric practice that disclosed patients’ protected health information when responding to their negative online reviews. The practice paid $30,000 and agreed to a corrective action plan. [1]
The FTC rule on consumer reviews treats unfounded legal threats, intimidation or public false accusations made knowingly or with reckless disregard, used to prevent a review or get it removed as an unfair or deceptive practice. Removal has to rest on real grounds, such as a policy breach or a false statement of fact. [3]
The same rule prohibits businesses from writing, creating or selling reviews that misrepresent whether the reviewer exists or used the service. We never add invented reviews; we remove the fake ones and help genuine patient feedback reach your profile. [4]
Each engagement combines the services the case needs. These are the ones healthcare clients use most.
Fake reviews, defamatory posts and misleading pages taken down at the source through platform and legal channels.
Attack threads and comments removed through moderators, admins or legal channels, or pushed down when removal is not possible.
Fake and policy-violating reviews taken down, strictly within Trustpilot’s own rules.
Damaging results pushed off page one by ranking accurate, authoritative content for the doctor and the clinic.
Old or duplicate practice listings you no longer control taken out of Google Search and Maps.
We reframe the sources and signals Google’s AI Overview reads, so the summary of your name rests on accurate, verified sources.
The same search for your name or firm before we act, and after we remove what can be removed, suppress the rest and rebuild what ranks.
Coverage of [Your Name] is dominated by complaints and a disputed story.
[Your Name] is described accurately, with verified sources and recent positive coverage leading the result.
A confidential plan that never requires you to share patient records with the public.
We map what ranks for the practitioner and the practice across Google, review sites, directories and AI answers, and flag what is removable.
For each item we identify the pathway: platform policy, fake or non-patient review, defamation or misleading health content. You get a clear plan before any work begins.
We pursue the removals, suppress what cannot come down and strengthen your owned profiles and listings. Nothing we file or publish discusses a patient’s care.
We watch page one, your review profiles and the AI answers every week and react when something new appears.
Published with our clients’ permission, names hidden where they asked.
Two Reddit threads and an attack subreddit ranked for a London surgeon’s name. Today seven of the ten page-one results are brand-owned.
Inaccurate Google reviews, full Reddit threads and misleading comments taken down, and a 5-star Google rating regained.
50 to 60 false reviews removed over two to three months while genuine client feedback reached the profile.
A Google Sites page posing as a former client’s complaint about a health program, removed by Google after a legal request on defamation grounds.
How to protect your professional name, claim your listings and respond to reviews without breaching patient privacy.
Cannot find what you are looking for? Send us your question and we answer within one business day.
Send your questionFor content removal, you are billed only when the URL is verified offline. No retainer, no setup fee. For ongoing reputation management, the first month is contingent on the strategy we deliver in week one. If you do not see the path forward, you do not pay.
Only when it breaks the platform’s rules or the law, for example when it is fake, posted by someone who was never a patient or contains false statements of fact. An honest opinion from a real patient usually stays up. In that case we suppress it and strengthen the accurate content around it.
No. We work from what is published online and from the facts you choose to share about whether a reviewer was ever a patient. We never ask you to disclose a patient’s care, and we never post replies that discuss it.
Yes. The same approach works for physicians, surgeons, dentists, clinics and wellness businesses. The plan depends on whether the problem sits on the practitioner’s name, the practice or both.
It depends on the case. A single policy-violating review can come down quickly, while suppressing a thread or an article that ranks well takes longer. We tell you what is realistic up front.
Yes. Every client signs an NDA, and so do we. Our case studies only show clients who gave us permission.
Send us what ranks for your name or your practice and we review it for free: what can be removed, what we suppress and how we rebuild page one. We answer within one business day.
Last reviewed 2026-11-02. This page is general information, not legal advice.